+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Grok-4 Heavy
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 20.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.5% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (100.0%), HMMT25 (96.7%), GPQA (88.4%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:44.2%(+20.3%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:23.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:44.2%(+20.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:23.9%
Providers:0