+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Grok Code Fast 1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 54.2% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:58.9%(+54.2%)
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:4.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
1 providers
xAI
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:58.9%(+54.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:4.7%
Providers:1