+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Kimi-k1.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 7.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.7% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), CLUEWSC (91.4%), C-Eval (88.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:42.1%(+7.1%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:35.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:42.1%(+7.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:35.0%
Providers:0