+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 19.0% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Kimi K2 0905 is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (94.5%), MMLU (90.2%), MATH (89.1%). It supports a 524K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:44.2%(+19.0%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:25.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
2 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:44.2%(+19.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:25.2%
Providers:2