+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 5.5% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:35.3%(+5.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:29.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:35.3%(+5.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:29.9%
Providers:0