+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 20.4% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:44.2%(+20.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:23.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:44.2%(+20.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:23.8%
Providers:0