+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 16.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny was developed as an ultra-efficient vision-language model, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Built to enable multimodal AI on edge devices and mobile applications, it distills vision-language capabilities into a minimal footprint for widespread accessibility.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
3 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:66.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:82.9%(+16.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:66.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:82.9%(+16.8%)
Providers:7