+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 35.0% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small 2506 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.2% across 4 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (70.7%), GPQA (68.2%), AIME 2025 (62.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:49.1%(+35.0%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:14.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:49.1%(+35.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:14.1%
Providers:0