+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 16.8% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:40.2%(+16.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:23.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:40.2%(+16.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:23.4%
Providers:2