+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 15.4% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 days newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:28.5%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:43.9%(+15.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:28.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:43.9%(+15.4%)
Providers:2