+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 40.0% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:52.0%(+40.0%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:12.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:52.0%(+40.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:12.0%
Providers:0