+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Pixtral Large leads with 14.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Pixtral Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny was developed as an ultra-efficient vision-language model, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Built to enable multimodal AI on edge devices and mobile applications, it distills vision-language capabilities into a minimal footprint for widespread accessibility.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
25 days newer
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:67.2%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:81.7%(+14.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:67.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:81.7%(+14.6%)
Providers:1