+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 14.2% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), HumanEval (88.4%), HellaSwag (85.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:27.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:41.8%(+14.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:27.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:41.8%(+14.2%)
Providers:0