+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2 72B Instruct leads with 11.9% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.6% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.1%), CMMLU (90.1%), HellaSwag (87.6%). Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:28.5%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Average Score:40.4%(+11.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:28.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Avg Score:40.4%(+11.9%)
Providers:0