+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 7.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
Launched on the same date
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:70.9%(+7.8%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:63.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:70.9%(+7.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:63.1%
Providers:0