+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 2.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 798.2K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is $4809.13 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
9 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($4809.13 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:57.0%(+2.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:54.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:57.0%(+2.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:54.2%
Providers:1