+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 19.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 798.2K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $4809.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
12 days newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($4809.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:51.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:70.7%(+19.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:70.7%(+19.6%)
Providers:1