+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 16.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 798.2K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $4809.13 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
1 month newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($4809.13 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:51.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:68.0%(+16.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:68.0%(+16.9%)
Providers:1