+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 28.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 855.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $4806.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
5 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50($4806.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:51.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:79.7%(+28.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:79.7%(+28.6%)
Providers:2