+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 21.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 855.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $4809.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
6 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($4809.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:51.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:72.9%(+21.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:72.9%(+21.8%)
Providers:1