+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 7.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 3.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Gemma 3 27B is $4809.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
2 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($4809.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:84.6%(+7.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:77.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:84.6%(+7.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:77.0%
Providers:2