+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 offers 194.6K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is $4749.50 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
6 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00($4749.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1