+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 5.0% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:35.5%(+5.0%)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:30.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:35.5%(+5.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:30.4%
Providers:0