+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Grok-2 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 5.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-2 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
4 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:69.1%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:74.8%(+5.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:69.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:74.8%(+5.8%)
Providers:0