+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Grok-2 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 21.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-2 mini is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.2%), MMLU (86.2%), HumanEval (85.7%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:52.2%(+21.1%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:31.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:52.2%(+21.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:31.2%
Providers:0