+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Grok-4 Heavy
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 25.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.5% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (100.0%), HMMT25 (96.7%), GPQA (88.4%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:49.6%(+25.8%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:23.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:49.6%(+25.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:23.9%
Providers:0