+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 7.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Llama 4 Scout is $4809.12 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
3 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($4809.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:73.3%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:80.8%(+7.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:73.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:80.8%(+7.5%)
Providers:6