+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 2.6% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 offers 122.4K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $4809.20 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
2 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($4809.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:73.3%(+2.6%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:70.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:73.3%(+2.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:70.8%
Providers:1