+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek VL2 vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Pixtral Large leads with 6.8% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 offers 2.6K more tokens in context window than Pixtral Large. Pixtral Large is $4801.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Pixtral Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
25 days newer
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00($4801.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:74.9%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:81.7%(+6.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
1 providers
Replicate
Throughput: 22 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:74.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:81.7%(+6.8%)
Providers:1