+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Medium vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Devstral Medium. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $2.03 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium was created as a development-focused model, designed to assist with software engineering workflows and developer-centric tasks. Built to provide balanced capability for coding, debugging, and technical documentation, it serves as a versatile tool for professional development environments.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Devstral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-07-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Input:$0.40
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($2.03 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1