+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Medium vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 40.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.6% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (61.6%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Devstral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-07-10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Average Score:15.4%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:55.7%(+40.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Avg Score:15.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:55.7%(+40.3%)
Providers:0