+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Medium vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Devstral Medium offers 192.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Devstral Medium is $57.60 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium was created as a development-focused model, designed to assist with software engineering workflows and developer-centric tasks. Built to provide balanced capability for coding, debugging, and technical documentation, it serves as a versatile tool for professional development environments.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
14 days newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Devstral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-07-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Input:$0.40
Output:$2.00($57.60 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1