Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Devstral Medium leads with 38.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini offers 824.3K more tokens in context window than Devstral Medium. Both models have similar pricing. GPT-4.1 mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Devstral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium was created as a development-focused model, designed to assist with software engineering workflows and developer-centric tasks. Built to provide balanced capability for coding, debugging, and technical documentation, it serves as a versatile tool for professional development environments.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
2 months newer

GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14

Devstral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-07-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Devstral Medium

GPT-4.1 mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Devstral Medium

GPT-4.1 mini
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Devstral Medium

GPT-4.1 mini
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Devstral Medium
Mistral AI

GPT-4.1 mini

Devstral Medium

GPT-4.1 mini

Devstral Medium

GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
ZeroEval