+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Medium vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 71.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is $0.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.6% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (61.6%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.9%), GSM8k (96.8%), API-Bank (92.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 8 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Devstral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-07-10
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Input:$0.40
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input:$0.89
Output:$0.89($0.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Average Score:3.2%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:75.0%(+71.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Avg Score:3.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:75.0%(+71.8%)
Providers:8