+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Medium vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 48.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $2.37 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.6% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (61.6%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Devstral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-07-10
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Input:$0.40
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($2.37 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Average Score:3.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:52.1%(+48.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Devstral Medium
Avg Score:3.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:52.1%(+48.3%)
Providers:1