+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Small 1.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Devstral Small 1.1. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Small was developed as a more efficient development-focused model, designed to bring software engineering assistance to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide coding capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables developer tools in environments where efficiency is paramount.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
7 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.10 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1