+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Small 1.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Devstral Small 1.1. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Small was developed as a more efficient development-focused model, designed to bring software engineering assistance to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide coding capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables developer tools in environments where efficiency is paramount.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.03 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1