Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Devstral Small 1.1 leads with 22.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Devstral Small 1.1. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Devstral Small 1.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Mistral AI
Devstral Small was developed as a more efficient development-focused model, designed to bring software engineering assistance to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide coding capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables developer tools in environments where efficiency is paramount.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
24 days newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17

Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Devstral Small 1.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Devstral Small 1.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Devstral Small 1.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Devstral Small 1.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Devstral Small 1.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite