+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Small 1.1 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 48.8% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. The model shows competitive results across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (53.6%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($0.37 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Average Score:3.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:52.1%(+48.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Avg Score:3.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:52.1%(+48.8%)
Providers:1