+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Devstral Small 1.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than Devstral Small 1.1. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Devstral Small was developed as a more efficient development-focused model, designed to bring software engineering assistance to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide coding capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables developer tools in environments where efficiency is paramount.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
3 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.37 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 137.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.23ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
Devstral Small 1.1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:7