+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemini 1.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 1.0M more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.5 Flash is $1.25 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
2 months newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($1.25 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:43.6%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:59.9%(+16.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:43.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:59.9%(+16.4%)
Providers:1