+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 4.3% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
4 months newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:59.8%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:64.1%(+4.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:59.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:64.1%(+4.3%)
Providers:0