+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 1B leads with 3.3% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:30.3%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:33.6%(+3.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:30.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:33.6%(+3.3%)
Providers:0