+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 35.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 221.2K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemma 3 27B is $1.70 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($1.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:30.3%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:65.7%(+35.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:30.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:65.7%(+35.5%)
Providers:2