+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro leads with 7.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:49.9%(+7.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:42.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:49.9%(+7.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:42.4%
Providers:0