+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GPT-4 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 24.9% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 Turbo offers 91.1K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $38.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
1 month newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50($38.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Input:$10.00
Output:$30.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:44.1%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:69.0%(+24.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:44.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:69.0%(+24.9%)
Providers:2