+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro leads with 11.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:71.8%(+11.4%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:60.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:71.8%(+11.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:60.4%
Providers:0