+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 25.6% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 offers 95.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $10.00 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
6 months newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50($10.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:45.4%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:70.9%(+25.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:45.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:70.9%(+25.6%)
Providers:1