+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 43.4% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 offers 95.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50($16.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:37.9%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:81.3%(+43.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:37.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:81.3%(+43.4%)
Providers:1