+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 56.1% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 Mini offers 95.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Grok-3 Mini is $1.20 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50($1.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:27.9%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:84.0%(+56.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:27.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:84.0%(+56.1%)
Providers:1