Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 19.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 215.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $1.97 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 9 benchmarks. Notable strengths include BIG-Bench (75.0%), MMLU (71.8%), WMT23 (71.7%). The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra